-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
Normative: Delete superfluous era aliases to align with CLDR #72
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
ptomato
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍
|
I'm not sure what needs to happen next with this, procedurally. Does it need to be presented to TC39 for consensus? (FWIW, this is why I preferred that we point to CLDR and not duplicate this info in the spec text) |
|
I'll note: CLDR doesn't have nearly as much detail as we want (like the arithmetic year stuff), referencing it wouldn't be great i think. |
|
Let's agree in TG2 this week that we want this, then we include it in the Stage 3 presentation. |
5e2bc5e to
9ad1d5d
Compare
|
This reached consensus in the TC39 plenary of 2025-11-20. |
…-reviewers,mgaudet Add eras specified in the proposal, except for the ones which will be removed in <tc39/proposal-intl-era-monthcode#72>. Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D272035
…nkey-reviewers,mgaudet Remove aliases per <tc39/proposal-intl-era-monthcode#72>. Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D272036
…-reviewers,mgaudet Add eras specified in the proposal, except for the ones which will be removed in <tc39/proposal-intl-era-monthcode#72>. Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D272035
…nkey-reviewers,mgaudet Remove aliases per <tc39/proposal-intl-era-monthcode#72>. Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D272036
The latest version of unicode-org/cldr#4519 seeks to align with Temporal Intl Era Month Code, but it also removes more of the old era aliases.
I think we should land this PR along with the CLDR one, because we can add the aliases back, but it is hard to remove them. We don't have any evidence that these era aliases are in use.
Ideally we would have removed these before Stage 2.7.
I guess this is Normative, but it is also trying to align with CLDR, but CLDR is trying to align with Intl Era Month Code.
@robertbastian